Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EdnaMode

How does the pre-op “father” know that his “daughter” is a “girl” ... isn’t “he” supposed to say something like “biological girl, gender unknown”? That’s quite a cisnormative thing for “him” to say, isn’t it?


43 posted on 07/08/2017 9:29:08 AM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zencycler

YES. There is way to much assuming going on here.


47 posted on 07/08/2017 9:36:51 AM PDT by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: zencycler

Good point!


54 posted on 07/08/2017 10:44:34 AM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: zencycler

Bing Bing Bing, we have a winner.

Exactly right. The “father” who gave birth was born female but is REALLY a man because he wants to be.

How can that SAME man/woman/freak be SO insensitive to just ASSUME that baby is a girl just because she has no penis or testicles (yet).

It might actually be a MAN trapped in that little baby body. I say he/she should be fined for GLTQXYZ discrimination!


59 posted on 07/08/2017 11:34:46 AM PDT by John Milner (Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson