I wonder what the FReeper females have to say about this?
If I did not know her unsavory background and simply met her as, let's say, a businesswoman, neighbor, or corporate wife, I would say that for 64 she's doing very well indeed. Not many women of that age have legs that good. I would add also that even with toned legs, (a) she shouldn't wear such short skirts unless she's going to some very casual event, (b) it's not fair to compare her to one of the world's greatest beauties, because nobody can stand that comparison, (c) most of the people on this thread who say her legs are scrawny probably don't have such fabulous legs themselves, and will be lucky indeed if their wives are as trim at 64, and (d) Vogue has for many years been decadent, corrupt, and culturally destructive. The opinions of its editors are usually the opposite of the truth. Remember how much they adored Michelle Obama.