Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timpanagos1

I can’t believe that you’re defending a powerful entity for using that immense power to intimidate a private citizen into shutting up. Since it’s legal, if you’re correct, does CNN just get to continue to threaten and intimidate people (little people of course, famous people have a little more recourse, though the left uses the power of shunning against famous conservatives) who express things which CNN opposes or resents? That is certainly one way to shut all of us up.


191 posted on 07/05/2017 8:21:29 AM PDT by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn. I hate autocorre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmel

CNN crossed the line when Kaczynski published his statements regarding CNN reserving the right to reveal the person’s identity in the public domain.

Had they simply revealed this person’s identity without the coercive interaction they may have been able to get away with it, but alas, this is CNN. Their balls are bigger than their brains.


194 posted on 07/05/2017 8:27:07 AM PDT by bar sin·is·ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson