Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timpanagos1

I didn’t say they couldn’t legally do what they’re doing, but you can’t say they’re not being hypocritical bullies considering the different ways they treated the free speech of a private citizen and the way they treated the free speech of Kathy Griffith. We have every right to call them out for it, and they are being bullies, because at least Griffith is a celebrity. They didn’t have a problem with her free speech and didn’t threaten her. They have a problem with this guy’s free speech amd threatened him. If they get away with it, that means that CNN gets to control “free” speech. They already have a powerful platform to advance their narrative, and now they’re going to try to stifle the free speech of private citizens? It may be legal, but it’s completely unethical, and the rest of us private citizens have to do what we can to oppose it, or CNN controls public speech.


188 posted on 07/05/2017 8:14:04 AM PDT by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn. I hate autocorre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmel

“It may be legal, but it’s completely unethical,...”

I have stated that their process to reveal the person’s name my not be ethical.


189 posted on 07/05/2017 8:16:35 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson