To: LUV W
Camden, NJ 48th worst? Obviously the whole article is crap.
4 posted on
07/03/2017 4:54:50 PM PDT by
wireman
To: wireman
Newark isn’t there either. It’s absolutely, positively CRAP!
11 posted on
07/03/2017 4:59:20 PM PDT by
Rockitz
(This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: wireman
I've been around much of the country and this is a pretty good listing of worst places. Most of the big cities (like New York, Boston, Chicago) are great to live in if you can afford it. Of course some bad areas in all the big cities but generally you can completely avoid the bad areas if you live in the better areas. There are probably lifetime residents of Manhattan who have never set foot in places like Brownsville (Brooklyn) or Hunt's Point (Bronx). I've been to Chicago multiple times and have yet to set foot in the areas that are getting all the shootings.
There are some cities however where you can't escape the awfulness. Waterbury, CT; Lawrence, MA; Camden, NJ are examples of that. I'm surprised Bridgewater, CT wasn't on the list.
To: wireman
No one in their right mind would want to live in **Camden**!! The only people still left in the city can't find the means to leave or are too stoned or drunk to care.
53 posted on
07/03/2017 6:11:52 PM PDT by
wintertime
(Stop treating government teachers like they are reincarnated Mother Teresas!)
To: wireman
the whole article is crap...
81 posted on
07/03/2017 7:50:59 PM PDT by
cherry
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson