Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: faucetman

Okay, I stand corrected. I was basing what I said based on the posted Breitbart article.

“WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Monday to let President Trump’s immigration travel ban go into effect for some travelers, reversing the actions of lower federal courts that had put the controversial policy completely on hold.”

So a PARTIAL correction. Not really much of a victory, for now.

“The court is allowing the ban to go into effect for foreign nationals who lack any “bona fide relationship with any person or entity in the United States.” The court, in an unsigned opinion, left the travel ban against citizens of six majority-Muslim on hold as applied to non-citizens with relationships with persons or entities in the United States, which includes most of the plaintiffs in both cases.”

“.....left the travel ban against citizens of six majority-Muslim on hold ...... which includes most of the plaintiffs in both cases.”

Not exactly “WINNING” is it?


42 posted on 06/26/2017 8:32:47 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: faucetman

Wow. Talk about trying REALLY hard to see the glass half empty.


59 posted on 06/26/2017 8:49:13 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson