You think they aren’t already? Do you think that a different ruling here would prevent them somehow? Christian churches should not RELY on government funding but that isn’t the issue. The issue is whether Christians may be discriminated against simply because they are Christians. There is no need to conflate two different issues to make the legal marginalization of Christianity any easier or a precedent.
It’s just me. I don’t think churches should take money from the government because then the government controls them.
Also, I don’t want anything calling itself a church sucking at the teat of government.