***But in San Diego, the sheriff defined “good cause” as requiring a “particularized” need for self-defense that separates the applicant from an average applicant.***
9th circuit agreed with a san diego sheriff in that. Scotus just left it in place.
Sounds to me like local sheriffs are in charge of your concealed/open carry gun rights if they think you don’t have some specific issue making carry a necessity for you.
[[Sounds to me like local sheriffs are in charge of your concealed/open carry gun rights if they think you don’t have some specific issue making carry a necessity for you.]]
That’s\ exactly what it is- and for the SC not to take this issue up is astonishing=- califormia is clearly violating the second amendment- there is no constitutional requirement that someone must show ‘need’ before they can be issued a right to own and carry