To: Robert A. Cook, PE
But what decision DID they leave in place????
From the article:
"California law generally prevents carrying a handgun outside a home, but concealed carry is allowed for those with a license. Applicants for such a license need to demonstrate "good cause" to obtain the license, which several sheriffs have taken to mean including carrying a handgun for self-defense, as the petitioners noted in their brief to the Supreme Court. But in San Diego, the sheriff defined "good cause" as requiring a "particularized" need for self-defense that separates the applicant from an average applicant."
The ruling which stands is that the sheriff's policy does not violate the 2nd Amendment.
To: AnotherUnixGeek
The ruling which stands is that the sheriff's policy does not violate the 2nd Amendment. That sheriff and the SCOTUS can kiss my a$$.
The good Lord gives us the right and the 2nd codifies it.
I will carry when and how I want to and no MAN will deprive me of that
40 posted on
06/26/2017 9:30:57 AM PDT by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson