Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: virgil
It must be pretty embarrassing, since we don't have much information about what happened. Who was on the bridge of the Fitz? Where were the decision makers? What was going on? Drinking, drugs, incompetence or just the millennial "Whatever" attitude?

I know people connected to the Fitz, but I have not even heard hints at what happened. I assume an admiral ordered no leaks, not because there is anything worse involved than the obvious but to make sure the first version of events that gets out is correct. I assume, despite this statement, that the container ship had no one awake on the bridge. I also assume the Fitz did several monumentally stupid things (no, no one I know has commented either way on the Captain or any other officer). I expect the details to come out once the formal investigation is complete.

140 posted on 06/26/2017 11:23:27 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1
not because there is anything worse involved than the obvious but to make sure the first version of events that gets out is correct.

Makes it hard to explain why the Navy (or I should say the media reporting that the Nevy ) kept insisting the accident happened at 2:30am instead of 1:30am.

146 posted on 06/26/2017 11:36:51 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson