Sue to get your own money back? The case was originally dismissed with a “no standing”ruling. No standing for your own assets???
>
Sue to get your own money back? The case was originally dismissed with a “no standing”ruling. No standing for your own assets???
>
“Own assets”?? The case was ‘The People vs. $17500’. No where did the names of those suing can up in THAT case; hence, no ‘standing’.
See, Leftist logic is easy /s
And, since A.F. has had a track-record, contrary to it being contrary to the Constitutions, it has ‘precedent’. That makes it doubly-legally good, y’know? No need to go back further than the initial ‘law’...