Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverevergiveup
Sears blew it another way, too. Years ago, during the dot com boom, everybody was putting everything on the internet. Pets.com, Cars.com, etc. This was when Amazon just sold books. A lot of these businesses did not translate well to online sales, (Think of Garden.com selling 50 pound bags of mulch).

Sears, however, was uniquely placed to be an internet giant -- they already owned the shop-by-mail industry and had been in catalog sales for over 100 years. All they had to do was put their catalog online. That has to be the biggest missed opportunity in forever.

149 posted on 06/25/2017 12:02:32 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: sportutegrl
Agree entirely. This is what I was referring to. Paraphrasing what someone else said on this thread, Sears were the Amazon of catalogue sales, and could have used this as a springboard to be an extremely successful online ‘store’. Someone in a boardroom somewhere in Sears history was probably challenged with this possible change in business strategy, and rejected it. Funny how big things hinge on what seem like relative small decisions at the time.
158 posted on 06/25/2017 12:18:41 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: sportutegrl

It makes sense thought why they didn’t choose to be an online provider for their products. They had too many employees and real estate. Any CEO would have been fired.


231 posted on 06/25/2017 7:47:17 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson