Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws
argued that the death of their son deprived them of financial support through his future potential wages. ..

To determine the settlement amount, they must of added up all the potential, now impossible, strong-arm robbery "earnings".

15 posted on 06/23/2017 10:37:23 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C210N

He is literally worth more to them dead than he ever was or would have been, alive. Cold but true.


31 posted on 06/23/2017 10:45:51 AM PDT by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: C210N
To determine the settlement amount, they must of added up all the potential, now impossible, strong-arm robbery "earnings".

And it still seems like a lot, but if you consider the loss of "earnings" from the future progeny that will now not be conceived (not to mention the public assistance these descendants would have received), the family settled cheap.

It may not look like it initially, but the lawful taxpayer comes out ahead.

Hmmm, perhaps I'm not the cynic I have assumed, and am actually a "glass half full" type of personality.

36 posted on 06/23/2017 10:48:48 AM PDT by Ezekiel (All who mourn(ed!) the destruction of America merit the celebration of her rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson