Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

The issue with the time of the collision really needs to be cleared up, because it’s really messing with some interpretations of events.

The 1.30am collision time now reported by the Japanese coastguard makes way more sense for the Crystal’s path.


47 posted on 06/23/2017 10:40:21 AM PDT by The Numbers (God, Family and Country is Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Numbers

“””The issue with the time of the collision really needs to be cleared up, because it’s really messing with some interpretations of events.””


I believe the 1:30 time of collision is cleared up. I have seen several reports stating the US Navy is not going to disagree with the 1:30 time. It seems only those who have some sort of reason for messing with the interpretation of events are having problems accepting 1:30.

If one looks at the Crystal chart at 1:30 the Crystal makes a 90 degree turn. There is no way a container ship could make a 90 degree turn in that short a distance without having its bow pushed by a very powerful destroyer that had just crossed the container ship’s path and said destroyer was now impaled by the Crystal’s bulbous bow.


60 posted on 06/23/2017 10:52:27 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson