Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Snipe
My guess is that the bridge watch was negligent in standing their watch. That is the Captains’ responsibility, He qualified them for the watch.

The Captain had just taken command a month or so previous to the accident. There is noway he can evaluate staff fitness in such short order.

112 posted on 06/23/2017 12:20:04 PM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: EVO X

The instant he says “I relieve you” at the change of command ceremony, the new Captain assumes 100 per cent responsibility for everything and everyone on that ship. It is his responsibility to qualify the personnel that will handle the ship during their watch. By definition, if they are deficient in carrying out their duties, the Captain is deficient in carrying out his responsibility. That is how our Navy operates. These issues of watch qualification will be examined during the investigation and will be discussed at the Courts Martial if one should occur.


116 posted on 06/23/2017 12:30:50 PM PDT by Bull Snipe (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: EVO X

He was the XO of the Fitzgerald from November of 2015 until he became Captain a month or so ago.

As XO he should have known the crew and their capabilities better than anyone else.

It isn’t as if this guy just popped into existence a month or so ago.


127 posted on 06/23/2017 1:38:15 PM PDT by sipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson