The arguments I made remain valid, however, even with respect to the 1795 Act. There never was a two-parent requirement, and there has never been an absolute place of birth requirement (although where you are born and who your parents are do factor in). All the cherry-picked SCOTUS rulings and out-of-context quotes (not to mention the poor grammar skills) will not change it. That's the most annoying part - the deliberate misreading of the words of the Constitution and the claims that the Founders actually meant something they never bothered to put on paper. How is that any different from redefining 'militia'? If they want to change the rules, they need to get an amendment. That has been done nearly thirty times, so if their position has merit, surely they can persuade the people. Otherwise they are no different from the gun-grabbers and the administrative-statists.
I think the reason they didn’t put in a two parent requirement was because at that time the wife took her husband’s citizenship at marriage and was irrelevant in determining citizenship of her children.