Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Department probes Clinton handling of government emails, could pull her security clearance
Fox News ^ | June 20, 2017 | Malia Zimmerman

Posted on 06/20/2017 2:32:17 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant

The State Department has opened a formal inquiry into whether former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her aides mishandled classified information while she was the nation’s top diplomat, Fox News has learned. Despite being under investigation, Clinton and her staffers still have security clearances to access sensitive government information.

The department’s investigation aims to determine whether Clinton and her closest aides violated government protocols by using her private server to receive, hold and transmit classified and top-secret government documents. The department declined to say when its inquiry began, but it follows the conclusion of the FBI’s probe into the matter, which did not result in any actions being taken against Clinton or any of her aides.

Depending on the outcome of the current State Department inquiry, Clinton and her aides could have their access to sensitive government documents terminated.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, confirmed the department’s formal inquiry.

Meanwhile, Grassley’s committee launched its own inquiry into Clinton’s handling of emails, an inquiry that began in March. Grassley cited among his concerns the July 5 statement of former FBI Director James Comey that the agency found Clinton and her staff members were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.” Grassley also contended there is “evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information...”

During the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s use of top-secret and classified information on her private server, Comey said there were seven email chains on Clinton’s computer that were classified at the “Top Secret/Special Access Program level.” Another 2,000 emails on her private server were found to have contained information deemed classified now, though not marked classified when sent. In addition, the server also contained 22 top-secret emails deemed too damaging to national security to be released.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary; hillaryclinton; hillaryemails; hillaryinvestigation; secstate; securityclearance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: LucyT; HarleyLady27

Still?


21 posted on 06/20/2017 2:53:37 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

That she still has any security clearance is amazing.

Right and so many more that still have security clearances that need to be taken away.......NOW!!


22 posted on 06/20/2017 2:54:58 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

Outrageous dereliction of duty to national security, by Tillerson’s State Dept.

UNIPARTY!


23 posted on 06/20/2017 2:55:54 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team forappreciatests coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

The default is to keep the clearance but not access for two years. Thus a person leaving a clearance job can move to another job without having to re-submit a full background check. They would have to submit the details for the time without access. It is a cost saving measure.

The larger question is why her clearance was not pulled the moment it was known that she mishandled the information.


24 posted on 06/20/2017 2:59:24 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

COULD???? They SHOULD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


25 posted on 06/20/2017 2:59:26 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

“Clinton and her staffers still have security clearances to access sensitive government information.”

You’re kidding me, right?

I don’t know if draining the swamp will work. Might have to nuke it.

5.56mm


26 posted on 06/20/2017 2:59:28 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Having a clearance does not automatically mean access.


27 posted on 06/20/2017 3:00:07 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

:)


28 posted on 06/20/2017 3:00:20 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski

Strictly PR for red meat conservatives. She doesn’t need clearance now.

Hillary left as SOS on February 1, 2013. That means that the federal statute of limitations on anything she’s likely to be charged with is up February 1, 2018 at the latest.


29 posted on 06/20/2017 3:00:53 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

“Why does any former office-holder have security clearance.”

Now that’s a good question.

L


30 posted on 06/20/2017 3:01:26 PM PDT by Lurker (America burned the witch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

IMO...once a elected or appointed official is gone..either fired, not reelected, retired, quit..whatever...they SHOULD NOT HAVE SECURITY CLEARANCES...PERIOD!!


31 posted on 06/20/2017 3:03:28 PM PDT by Osage Orange (ItÂ’s nice to be important, but itÂ’s more important to be nice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

And why would this decision take more than a millisecond to make?


32 posted on 06/20/2017 3:04:27 PM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

Why does she need security clearance?


33 posted on 06/20/2017 3:05:51 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant; All

They’ve been down this road for years! Comey let The Beast off the hook. When are the theatrics and melodrama going to end? If they want to perpetuate this, go after her with the Russian Uranium deal.


34 posted on 06/20/2017 3:06:57 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

>>Why does any former office-holder have security clearance.
Trump needs to cancel all security clearances that are not necessary — starting with violators of the Espionage Act.

President Trump or someone in the Administration needs to answer this question. The public has a right to know why these horrible anti-American people continue to have security clearances. It’s infuriating that what appears to be hundreds of Obama and Clinton operatives are still hanging around doing everything that can to thwart the will of the people who voted to be rid of them.


35 posted on 06/20/2017 3:07:42 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (God, Guns, and Trump will save the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

They keep telling us shes now a “ private citizen”
Private citizens have no need to know classified information


36 posted on 06/20/2017 3:09:06 PM PDT by silverleaf (We voted for change, not leftover change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
They are STILL a criminal enterprise

AMEN

Recently met a Jewish women who retired from State. She was "coming out of the closet" and joining up with the Republicans. SD is swamp central. The things she told me put my jaw on the floor.

37 posted on 06/20/2017 3:09:46 PM PDT by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

If she still has anything classified in her posesion, it would be another legal problem added to the list.


38 posted on 06/20/2017 3:11:14 PM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

>>How come the ENTIRE WORLD knows Hillary committed serious FELONIES by retaining and handling Top Secret documents on an unsecured and illegal home server but the State Dept. hasn’t quite figured that out yet?
The DEEP STATE DEPT. needs to be DEFUNDED and SHUT DOWN. They are STILL a criminal enterprise.

This situation more than anything else is what will turn Trump’s most loyal supporters, including myself, against him. And without our support he’s toast following the mid-terms. ARE YOU TRUMP OPERATIVES OUT THERE LISTENING TO WHAT I’M TELLING YOU?? GET THOSE BASTA*DS OUT OF THERE NOW!


39 posted on 06/20/2017 3:12:56 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant
Sen. Grassley's June 9, 2017 press release ...

State Dept. Reviewing Mishandling of Classified Information in Unauthorized Server Matter, yet Clinton, Aides Retain Clearances Jun 09, 2017

State Dept. letter to Grassley dated May 23, 2017

40 posted on 06/20/2017 3:15:54 PM PDT by TigersEye (Investigate the Awan brothers and Wasserman Schultz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson