[C210N]

Would it be Constitutional to allow a “special” class to protect themselves but not everyone else.

It's a lot worse than that.

Since the 2A is NOT for personal protection, but rather for protection from governmental tyranny... this law would grant protection FOR governmental tyranny, by arming government at the expense of the people.

[Terry Mross]

I’d bet that 90 % if the Republicans would vote for. The Democrats wouldn’t. Shows too much hypocracy. PLUS, most of them already carry. And DC police look the other way.

[marktwain]

Since the 2A is NOT for personal protection, but rather for protection from governmental tyranny...

It is for both.

Nowhere in the Second Amendment does it *exclude* personal protection.