Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GreyFriar

Timing for a favorable tide is a valid theory to bring up. However, weird maneuvers indicated by the merchant ship’s position plot is a strange way to do this timing. It is less expensive and easier just to reduce speed and keep to the best safe course.

Was anyone even in command of the merchant ship’s bridge?

None the less, any collision is ultimately the fault of both ships. No matter of the “rules of the road for the stand on versus give way vessel, every captain is completely responsible for avoiding a collision.

Was this collision intentional? Was there a reason that the USN ship was unable to maneuver to avoid collision?


115 posted on 06/17/2017 9:57:07 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Hootowl99

But look at the whole track. Why was that vessel even in “shallow waters” no where near it’s origin or destination?


164 posted on 06/18/2017 1:19:08 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Hootowl99

Yes, high tide was the only thing I could think of. I’m not a sailor, but living here in DC know that the ships that come into Alexandria often have to wait until high tide to do it if they need the water level, or low tide to get under the Wilson Bridge.

Your question is definitely valid: “Was anyone even in command of the merchant ship’s bridge?”


192 posted on 06/18/2017 6:37:12 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson