Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pinkbell
"It’s a sad situation, but ultimately, if people break domestic law, we don’t refrain from enforcing it if they have children."

Call me dim-witted, but I want to rephrase your comment so that I understand it. Please, no offense, but let me know if I'm totally off the mark.

if people break domestic law, we shouldn't (won't?)refrain avoid from enforcing it even if they have children who were born here.

IOW, and I keep repeating this on various posts: REPEAL THE ANCHOR BABY (14th) AMENDMENT! Turn off the benefits of having a kid here, and a lot, if not most, will think twice about sneaking in.

Related article: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-birth-tourism-persists-20161220-story.html

29 posted on 06/16/2017 11:53:56 AM PDT by fivecatsandadog (DRAIN THE SWAMP. BUILD THE WALL. EFF THE ACTIVIST JUDGES and Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: fivecatsandadog

My first thought was don’t repeal the 14th

But after giving it some thought, it would be a good idea

It was created for a specific time a certain class of citizens and has no effect on anyone alive today

Like many issues, this has been used for decades to create democrat voters and help turn the USA into a 3rd World country.


31 posted on 06/16/2017 12:46:52 PM PDT by Syncro (Repeal the 14th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson