Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txrefugee

“It costs more because our money has lost 60% of its value in the last 50 years.”

I think you are understating the case, I figure it’s far worse than that. Fifty years ago I was single, working for $110 a week, driving a new Mustang and partying like mad and still able to meet my obligations without problems. By my math sixty percent means you would need $275 a week to live that way now, not even remotely close to reality. Sixty percent sounds like the official version of events from the federal government which is disconnected from the real world. I would as soon believe figures quoted by Barack Obama.


138 posted on 06/12/2017 6:59:52 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism regardless of the race of the racist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: RipSawyer

“Sixty percent sounds like the official version of events from the federal government which is disconnected from the real world. I would as soon believe figures quoted by Barack Obama.”

You are letting your bias get in the way of facts. According to government figures, $110 in 1967 would be almost $800 today.


147 posted on 06/12/2017 9:41:40 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: RipSawyer
I know people today who pay in just 3-6 monthly mortgage payments, the equivalent of what my folks would have paid for the total cost of their first new home, which they bought on ONE income.☺

We've been had.

153 posted on 06/12/2017 10:02:59 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson