Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaxxonWoods

That’s why you see all the suppositions as opposed to evidence.

Sorry, but you must not have done much reading if you think there’s no evidence of more than one shooter


71 posted on 06/05/2017 1:13:22 AM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: WilliamIII
There is no evidence of another shooter! Saying Oswald's scope was bad, he couldn't get off that many shots in the necessary time, or the backyard photos were fake are not evidence of another shooter. There are no shell casings, no photos, no fingerprints or confessions of any paid assassin. There are rumor, innuendo, coincidences, and murky photos that show nothing.

And conspiracy buffs always ignore John Connelly, who's wounds CLEARLY show a shooter from the rear.

109 posted on 06/05/2017 8:42:17 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson