Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
Lincoln was an absolutely terrible President and our perception of him is based on a lot of fawning bios and misinformation.

I recently read of a book written back in the 1940’s that pretty much told the truth of how he really was, then more recently there are two books by Thomas J. Dilorenzo that delve into Lincoln even more.

32 posted on 06/04/2017 1:19:04 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Peter Blood

No. DiLorenzo is a boob. We completely destroy him in “A Patriot’s History of the United States.” Lincoln has been very well written about by any number of great historians, including Allan Nevins. See our section on Lincoln, second best president to GW.

DiLorenzo is a Lincoln hater & not worth the time.


34 posted on 06/04/2017 1:56:47 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson