Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/02/2017 6:40:55 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Black Agnes

Ping.


2 posted on 06/02/2017 6:41:29 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black; Tilted Irish Kilt

Ping.


3 posted on 06/02/2017 6:44:15 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Reset Underway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

When you have lost the Army, you have lost....


4 posted on 06/02/2017 6:49:59 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Those 4 million white people need leave... NOW.


5 posted on 06/02/2017 7:02:23 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

The persistent problem in much of central and South America is what I call “Old Europe disease”. At the time of the conquest, Europe was still in the throes of monarchical feudalism of the kind just emerging from the Middle Ages.

This meant there were only two official classes, nobility and peasantry, under a form of Roman Law, that was dictated by the nobility. Wealth was concentrated with the nobility.

And this was translated to central and South America, and still exists there to this day.

Take Mexico for example. It is ruled by, and owned by, just a dozen wealthy families, who do not believe in sharing the wealth. In fact they oppose the idea of other people getting wealth, and go to lengths to prevent it.

Venezuela was much the same way, but even more extreme, a wealthy few ruling over grinding poverty for the many.

But the reaction to this is socialism, radical egalitarianism. If not to raise the poor, it is to strip the wealthy of wealth and power.

Yet this is its weak point. If they do have a revolution, and former peasants are now the leaders, they are still a part of the nobility and peasantry Old Europe system. They enrich themselves as the “new nobility”, yet still try to keep the poor in poverty.

This sounds quite ridiculous to Americans, whose nation was effectively founded a hundred years later, after the English Civil War and considerably greater democracy, and ability for all to gain wealth. And even that was not enough for the founding fathers, true believers in equality of opportunity, and with a great disdain for nobility.

So Americans have no problem with all, if they are making money, for other Americans to also make money.

But central and South America are caught between being ruled by a greedy wealthy class or out of control socialism tearing everything apart.


6 posted on 06/02/2017 7:03:55 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Baizuo" A derogatory term the Chinese are using to describe America's naive "White Left")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Not to mention that its about 50-50 chance to happen here.


18 posted on 06/02/2017 7:55:34 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Last sentence of the article:

"Border walls and Muslim bans are going to seen as such sensible policies."

30 posted on 06/02/2017 10:06:43 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson