Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: miss marmelstein

WE’RE OUT. FOR NOW.


Until the Democrats find a judge to keep us in. LOL.


124 posted on 06/01/2017 12:38:28 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: lodi90

Oh, God! True, lol!

He’s doing his old “we’ll look at it later,” which generally means “I’m trashing it.”

He couldn’t have gone back on his word. He would have lost all of us.


136 posted on 06/01/2017 12:39:39 PM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: lodi90

Not a joke. The reason to pull out cold turkey is to call into question whether the Agreement is merely implementing the 1992 Convention (which was Senate-approved), or whether it committed us to something new. That’s a Supreme Court case.


168 posted on 06/01/2017 12:43:21 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: lodi90

“Until the Democrats find a judge to keep us in. LOL.”

That would not surprise me.


292 posted on 06/01/2017 12:56:59 PM PDT by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson