Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dontreadthis

If this summary is what the author is saying, then the Wikileaks documents will have different metadata than those released by Guccifer.
++++
The question of the day for certain by Freeper dontreadthis.

SO, ARE THEY DIFFERENT OR NOT?

Does anyone know?


40 posted on 05/26/2017 7:25:43 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

Yes, they are different, completely different. If you go to the original Reddit thread, it links to one of the Wikileaks email attachments which are the same as one of Guccifer 2.0’s docs by content but totally different by metadata.

Warren Flood had nothing to do with the DNC emails at the time they were authored (his LinkedIn profile can be easily googled online; the author states he cannot link to Warren’s info due to site anti-doxxing rules); he appears to have been brought into solely to implant the Russian metadata.


43 posted on 05/26/2017 10:01:12 AM PDT by TrumpCoat (Longtime lurker, numbers junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint

Whoever hacked/obtained the DNC emails wanted to put a Russian signature on it. If Seth Rich was the source someone associated with wikileaks may have done this to try to protect him.

Or the whole operation could have come from a patriotic US intelligence insider.


50 posted on 05/28/2017 9:36:09 AM PDT by nvcdl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson