“And yet, for all that and more, Barack Obama certainly did not warrant articles of impeachment; he was not unhinged, nor did he offer any evidence of medical incapacity. He would not deserve to have his family smeared with jokes about incest or autism. Any Madonna-like talk of blowing him up in the White House would have been obscene, perhaps illegal, and probably grounds for prosecution.”
Context is everything. He was comparing the double standard applied to Trump and Obama.
I got that. But I still believe strongly that BHO deserved impeachment for many of the reasons Hanson enumerated. He even states "...Barack Obama subverted the Constitution..." If this is not a reason for impeachment, whatever could be?
It was an excellent article, but I disagree with Hanson's conclusion on this.