Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM Says No to Home Work
foxnews.com ^

Posted on 05/21/2017 1:57:15 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

International Business Machines is giving thousands of its remote workers in the U.S. a choice this week: Abandon your home workspaces and relocate to a regional office -- or leave the company.

The 105-year-old technology giant is quietly dismantling its popular decades-old remote work program to bring employees back into offices, a move it says will improve collaboration and accelerate the pace of work.

The changes comes as IBM copes with 20 consecutive quarters of falling revenue and rising shareholder ire over Chief Executive Ginni Rometty's pay package.

The company won't say how many of its 380,000 employees are affected by the policy change, which so far has been rolled out to its Watson division, software development, digital marketing, and design -- divisions that employ tens of thousands of workers.

The shift is particularly surprising since the Armonk, N.Y., company has been among the business world's staunchest boosters of remote work, both for itself and its customers. IBM markets software and services for what it calls "the anytime, anywhere workforce," and its researchers have published numerous studies on the merits of remote work.

In the past, IBM has boasted that more than 40% of employees worked outside traditional company offices, and a May 4 post on the company's Smarter Workforce blog stated that "telework works."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ibm; imb; remoteemployees; remoteworkers; telecommuting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Thibodeaux

That is a factor of the person, not the location.


81 posted on 05/21/2017 7:38:37 PM PDT by csivils
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

Attrition may be the entire point but I imagine the stats show less productivity among those not in the office as wel (in aggregate).


82 posted on 05/21/2017 7:40:51 PM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper
Yes, IBM courted me in the mid 1970s. Even their on-site repairmen, called Customer Engineers, were required to wear coat and ties. Even software engineers deep in the bowels of the company had to adhere to that code. They were a first class outfit. I just wouldn't have been able to cope with that sort of regimentation. I have always been a Lone Wolf.

I really loved their machinery. I cut my teeth on the IBM 1130 and later on the 360/370. I miss that stuff.

83 posted on 05/21/2017 7:51:18 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Not unless your hyper security requires a intranet setup. Networking from home is ok if you are writing a cookbook.. but advanced tech, probably safer inside. Maybe Hillary is getting hired there and they have to publish the rules in crayola.


84 posted on 05/21/2017 8:06:15 PM PDT by momincombatboots (Gas attacks. Substitute Sadam for Assad and Iraq for Syria? How many American lives do you commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

I’m a project lead with 30 people working for me and I wear jeans every day. On Friday I wear faded ones ;)

I find most people aren’t disciplined enough for the telework thing. Some are but most are not. I am not very effective from home.


85 posted on 05/21/2017 9:07:23 PM PDT by wgmalabama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: wgmalabama

This monday I will be working by myself at the office while my co-workers get the Memorial Day day off. I will relish it : )
2 co-workers on the east coast office will be there so we can instant message if need be. Not expecting many calls.
I get paid extra too : )


86 posted on 05/21/2017 9:20:18 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Collaboration is a joke.

My good friend has been on job interviews where management tries to goad him into the office “to collaborate.” His response is always the same:

“If local collaboration is so important, why is most of the team in India?”

In the end, all that matters is price.


In my friend’s experience interviewing, the companies that are hot on “collaboration” always have the worst open-plan offices. He calls them “buffet table” office layouts.


87 posted on 05/22/2017 5:44:28 AM PDT by bobcat62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SC_Republican
It is called Reduction by Relocation.

IBM is having serious financial issues. This ploy is just a way of getting folks to quit, and guess what? No severance, re-employment support, unemployment, etc.

Part of this Reduction by Relocation effort involves workers who support overseas clients. Those workers can relocate to the overseas country they support, at that country's prevailing wage.

As usual, follow the money!

88 posted on 05/22/2017 6:16:00 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: thulldud

That was SOP for a home office back in the mean old days of the 80s. The hardware, as a whole, was too darn larger otherwise.


89 posted on 05/28/2017 9:57:44 AM PDT by Professional Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: OttawaFreeper

I stopped wearing a tie at IBM in the early 70s. Never saw short pants though and this was in San Jose.


90 posted on 04/02/2018 5:00:33 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: techworker

Stay away from IBM. Been there, done that.


91 posted on 04/02/2018 5:05:27 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
Before folks jump ugly on IBM, the company may be worried about something like this....

NYC after-hours work email ban ‘great for business’, councilman says

If so, I don't blame them.

92 posted on 04/02/2018 5:11:00 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson