We could really question the impact of “women’s lib”.
I thought originally, the issues centered around equal rights for women in the workplace; that women are able to get into professional careers and be firemen and electricians and all the rest of it, alongside men. And that women would have more choices in their lives.
Somewhere along the lines, it seems it morphed into a movement for women to do those things, but also, to denigrate the women who choose to stay home with children, and/or have career moves take a backseat to the needs of the ir families. It’s as if the women’s movement didn’t want women to have more choices about their lives, but rather, fit into a straightjacket of going for the professional career, and having that take priority.
Many women seem to try to fit their family responsibilities around their careers, as opposed to fitting their careers and job around their families needs.
“Many women seem to try to fit their family responsibilities around their careers, as opposed to fitting their careers and job around their families needs.+”
-
So do many men.
.
Many women today wish they could have a “choice”; they are forced to work like men, and often they hate it more and more with every passing year.
I believe this is why plenty of young white women are going the ghetto route and breeding for freebies; the demographic trends are misleading because even the white birth rate has plenty of ticking socialist time bombs in it.