To: Erik Latranyi
The Stoner design has earned its stripes the hard way. I would be hesitant to scrap it just because the design is old. The design works very well despite its age. There is always room for improvement of course. The incorporation of an adjustable gas bleed off valve would be useful for example. and, not to sound like a fanatic, but chambering it in 6.5 Creedmoor would be a huge improvement too.
32 posted on
05/20/2017 12:27:40 PM PDT by
RC one
(The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
To: RC one
The 6.5 Creedmoor is too large for the AR15 platform. It would require an AR10 platform.
To: RC one
The Stoner design has earned its stripes the hard way. I would be hesitant to scrap it just because the design is old. The design works very well despite its age. There is always room for improvement of course. The incorporation of an adjustable gas bleed off valve would be useful for example. and, not to sound like a fanatic, but chambering it in 6.5 Creedmoor would be a huge improvement too.You made the case for replacing it in your own post.
The successor does not have to be revolutionary, it can be evolutionary or retain many of the design-elements that make the Stoner design robust.
However, there are many newer designs out there that are far, far more superior for a battlefield rifle.
66 posted on
05/21/2017 4:06:56 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(The largest and most dangerous hate-group in the US is now the Democratic Party)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson