The comments below the article touch on and even explain some of them.
“”There were a lot of statements in the article that were “cryptic.”””
Cryptic? THAT and with downright falsehoods. See my Post #19. It was so poorly written I can’t believe anyone would even waste the time to publish it...I’ll be on the watch for that guy and I’ll be sure to avoid anything by him in the future.
“”The comments below the article touch on and even explain some of them. “”
I can’t get any of the comments at the end of the article to come in...maybe it would have helped. If some have tried to explain what’s missing in the article then I feel vindicated in my criticism of a poorly written article.