If we can’t be sure that Global Warming is occurring based on a 30-year sample, we can’t be sure that Global Cooling is happening on the same sized sample.
We need to collect several thousand years worth of data to even have the slightest clue.
Without a LOT of CO2, the Earth is a huge, blue, ICE BALL!
Black-body night time is -450!!!!!!
Algore is the equivalent of Satan. Death and misery to the Earth, to you, and to your children.
(He gets millions$ and a big FY!)
OR We need to receive several billions of dollars to conduct the research.
There is far more real science, the kind based on actual empirical data and physical evidence, behind a prediction of global cooling than the smoke and mirrors supporting the AGW scam. Once the same clowns who have been pushing the latter can figure our how to blame a cooling climate on western civilization and make money on “solutions”, watch them pivot on a dime and try to throw thirty years of lies and fraud down a memory hole.
Well, not really.
We DO have thousands of years of proxy data: All of them establish that the earth’s climate can be approximated by a long 900-1000 year cycle (going back to the Minoeans Warming Period, Roman Warming Periods, Medieval Warming Period, and today’s Modern Warming Period. (Somebody needs to come up with another MWP abbreviation for the Romans!)
Since 1650, we have been climbing out of the Little Ice Age - when the Thames DID freeze regularly a natural event that will climax either now (2000-2010-2020) or after the next 66 year cycle somewhere around 2080-2090.
On top of that long cycle, there is a very obvious 66 year short cycle: 1890 - 1935-1945 - 2000-2010
They are getting their data from Sunspot activity. For the last few years, they have been few in number. Historically, this has signaled very cold weather combined with other events.