Posted on 05/02/2017 8:50:12 AM PDT by rhett october
On April 24, 2017 Seth Drayer and Dr. David Sanders debated the question, "Is abortion a moral injustice?" Mr. Drayer presented the affirmative case and Dr. Sanders presented the negative case.
During a public debate at Purdue University, Dr. David Sanders, associate professor of biology at Purdue, was in the middle of a rebuttal to abortion activist Seth Drayer‘s opening statement when he unexpectedly leveled child pornography charges at Drayer’s organization, Created Equal.
“He thinks fetuses are children, and he belongs to an organization that likes to show images of fetuses – and that’s something that’s a trademark,” Sanders began. “What would you call the public display of a butt-naked body of a child? I would call that child pornography.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJQeGh8gsgg
What an absolute idiot. It is a shame that taxpayer money is used to fund this useless wretch. It is unfortunate that his parents didn’t abort him.
What a DB. I had a libtard professor who was a tool like this and I challenged her on many items. The only reason I seemed to get away with it was that I was 20 plus years older than the average student and that I served in the military. The other students were petrified that I challenged anything. To be fair, my grades were good and I was not penalized. Today, a professor will fail students for speaking up or using critical thinking opposite liberal indoctrination.
Exactly my thought. His argument only works if a fetus=child.
That stupid hat should earn him an ass kicking all by itself.
L
His argument also only works if you consider the image of an unborn child to be of a sexually stimulating, erotic nature since those are elements of pornography by definition.
So not only is this leftists admitting an unborn child is human life, he is also admitting that he’s a pedophile.
Hey Professor Retard...I thought they were just clumps of goo, not babies. So go F yourself. In the mean time, idiots should be immediately fired.
By his reasoning (and I use the term loosely) humanitarians trying to illustrate the horrors of the Holocaust by showing the stacks of bodies at the camps are really necrophiliacs.
If the people are not allowed to see the results of abortions, abortion becomes just some meaningless word of no consequence.
Is that Sanders it post 19? If so he looks middle-aged crazy and a very sick one at that.
Hmm, you are probably right about that. Otherwise some art and Led Zeppelin’s Houses of the Holy would be an inappropriate album cover to sell in stores.
That was my first thought, during his rant he claimed a fetus was just cells, so cells can be naked? Does sound like he is admitting a fetus is a baby...that would have to mean abortion is murdering a baby. Hmmm just as I think it is.
Dear Lord, please hasten the day when baby-murdering tyrants in academia, intelligence, legislature, judiciary, entertainment, the corporate boardroom, and other places of power, wealth, and influence, get the just punishment they deserve.
This putrid meat-puppet spawn of Satan sees abortion as an erotic snuff film because he finds such images to be arousing. Normal people who are not full of demons, and have some vestige of humanity left in them, do not.
Let his name be added to the list.
No, the professor rejects the humanity of the unborn and their possession of God given human rights.
He’s posturing, signalling his cleverness for the benefit of his fellow progressives in their echo chamber.
To accept the humanity of the unborn would constitute thought crime, to be guarded against by wilful stupidity.
Orwell described the process thusly(from wikipedia):
Crimestop
“Crimestop” means to rid oneself of unwanted thoughts immediately, i.e., thoughts that interfere or disagree with the ideology of the Party. This way, a person avoids committing thoughtcrime.
In the novel, we hear about crimestop through the eyes of protagonist Winston Smith:
The mind should develop a blind spot whenever a dangerous thought presented itself. The process should be automatic, instinctive. Crimestop, they called it in Newspeak.
He set to work to exercise himself in crimestop. He presented himself with propositions—’the Party says the earth is flat’, ‘the party says that ice is heavier than water’—and trained himself in not seeing or not understanding the arguments that contradicted them.
Orwell also describes crimestop from the perspective of Emmanuel Goldstein in the book The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism:
Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.[6]
He runs for congress every few years.
I call it “what happens when Junior is a toddler and mom turns her back for a second.” Suffice it to say that I am the oldest of 5 siblings...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.