Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timpanagos1
The 1861-65 Civil War between the northern and southern states was principally caused by slavery.

No, slavery had nothing to do with the war until it was nearly over.
3 posted on 05/01/2017 3:41:56 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sopater
No, slavery had nothing to do with the war until it was nearly over.

The seceding States cited slavery as the principle reason for wanting to leave the Union.

6 posted on 05/01/2017 3:44:23 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater
“No, slavery had nothing to do with the war until it was nearly over.”

The South Carolina Declaration of Secession indicated that slavery was the reason.

10 posted on 05/01/2017 3:47:33 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

The southern states seceded, organized their own government, and forced the surrender of Fort Sumter. That’s what precipitated the war. The war was fought first to preserve the Union. But the war did settle the issue of slavery within the Union.


11 posted on 05/01/2017 3:48:32 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater
No, slavery had nothing to do with the war until it was nearly over.

Someone should have told the Southern leaders of the time. They thought it was about slavery.

32 posted on 05/01/2017 4:07:59 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

You’re spewing revisionist history. The secessionist politicians made it quite clear it was all about slavery when they voted to secede. Just read their speeches. It had been tearing the nation apart for decades before the war. When Lincoln was elected the slave owning Democrat elites who ran the south had a hysterical overreaction much like today’s Democrats had when Trump was elected. They succeeded before he was even sworn in.


53 posted on 05/01/2017 4:30:14 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

I agree. Slavery was used in New York to help get people to fight. The war - as always - was about money. The North (US) could not continue without the funds raised by the South through tariffs. It really was that simple.


55 posted on 05/01/2017 4:31:23 PM PDT by impactplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Don’t tell Keff Davis and his boys that. Their declaration specifically states that the secession was about slavery


64 posted on 05/01/2017 4:49:55 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

The 1861-65 Civil War between the northern and southern states was principally caused by slavery.

No, slavery had nothing to do with the war until it was nearly over.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yep, I caught that right away. The revision of that historical record is now cast in stone, and it wouldn’t surprise me to hear in the news one day that the refutation of it has been codified as a HATE CRIME!


94 posted on 05/01/2017 6:11:26 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (God, Guns, and Trump will save the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Don’t confuse them the facts


121 posted on 05/01/2017 7:24:52 PM PDT by piroque ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson