[Socon-Econ]

When the author was employed by the WSJ, he was trashing Trump from day 1. He is about to learn that who really hates free speech.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Crazy thing is, Bret Stephens didn't even "dispute" anthropogenic climate change. He practically stipulated it from the outset. He just said other hypotheses can still be considered, questions can still be raised, and spurious "certainty" should be rejected.

For this, he´s a planet-destroying, hurricane-causing, puppy-crushing fascist.

Consensus Clubhouse. Please check your brain at the door. You won´t be needing it.