Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A disturbing sex trend called 'stealthing' is going viral
keyetv ^ | April 27, 2017 | Vincent Crivelli|

Posted on 04/28/2017 11:34:03 AM PDT by bgill

Some call it stealthing, others calls it sexual assault. It’s a disturbing new trend with dangerous consequences. Men are taking off their condoms during sex without their partner’s knowledge, then bragging about it online. "To change this from a legal behavior to an illegal behavior, the legislature or the courts are going to have to further define what consent means,” Chamberlain said. The study also stated there is no record of a United States Court reviewing a case of stealthing. It did note foreign countries like Switzerland and Canada have prosecuted men for the act.

(Excerpt) Read more at keyetv.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: condoms; sexact; stealthing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: bgill

O.K. the deceit is wrong, granted. Now then, is it “stealthing” if the condom breaks during intercourse, but for whatever were the circumstances when and right after it broke, it was not noticed until it was over - release had occurred with a broken condom.

How about not seeing sex as recreation between uncommitted partners. In times past that whole situation would have been called “stealthing”. Can we make THAT a law?

No, doing the right thing in the first place is now verbotten as far as the law goes. You can be stupid and risky but only if the risks that can happen do happen is someone “guilty”. It’s - don’t worry, your not guilty if nothing goes wrong, so go ahead and treat sex as recreation between unattached couples. Don’t pray that all goes well though, you could have your prayer ignored.


21 posted on 04/28/2017 12:27:26 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

In the healthcare system, I was talking to a patient who had just found out he would be a father again, I think it was #5.
He was a single, homeless alcoholic/addict. I said, “Oh, that can be stressful,” meaning it was a big responsibility - he was totally nonchalant about it and I realized it was because he knew he would be contributing exactly zero dollars to the cost of the child, so it was no skin off his back.


22 posted on 04/28/2017 12:42:15 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

42? Must be a challenge for that many aspiring rappers to share the mic at the family reunion.


23 posted on 04/28/2017 12:43:36 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PrairieLady2
And God only knows how long it’s been going on since condoms were invented.

An old limerick (cleaned up):

In days of olde
When knights were bold,
Before rubbers were invented,
They used a sock
To cover their (male chickens)
And babies were prevented.

24 posted on 04/28/2017 12:44:23 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Good judgement comes from experience. And experience? Well, that comes from poor judgement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

With some of these “females” today, you’ll have to go back beyond grandma to find someone married.


25 posted on 04/28/2017 12:46:38 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I’m sure some of his “donations” will be in the joint before long, too.


26 posted on 04/28/2017 12:48:02 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Police Condom Inspectors on the government payroll. Swell.

But I wasn't even having sex I was just walking down the street!

I doesn't matter it's my job to see that you're properly outfitted with a condom and you weren't! We take the law very seriously here.

27 posted on 04/28/2017 12:50:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (Make up my mind, NBC,CBS,CNN,ABC. What are the "facts" today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ground_fog

Any opportunity to bash men. Have you seen the video floating around the internet from the unborn child to her Dad? It’s all about how she’s going to be assaulted, verbally abused, etc... and how he should tell his son not to do the name calling and abusing of women that he probably did as a teen.

It’s a disgrace. Feminism, like liberalism, is a mental illness.


28 posted on 04/28/2017 12:57:39 PM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bgill

My, aren’t people dense. No I didn’t read the article but that’s SOP. No women are involved in “Stealthing”. Crazy ass old white heterosexual! Nothing in today’s society is about you. Get over yourselves.


29 posted on 04/28/2017 1:06:25 PM PDT by wgmalabama (I was for Sessions before the country knew his name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Cuz being in “baby jail” for the next 18 years + is so attractive.


30 posted on 04/28/2017 1:09:03 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Poor little snowflakes now want the Government to protect them after they’ve said yes...... Well guess what...these gals are on their own then....what utter nonsense!

What happened to the idea “THEY” have control over their own bodies??????


31 posted on 04/28/2017 1:18:53 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Women are utter failures today in how they see themselves let alone a man. As always they want the “freedom” to do what they want, including sexually, but without the responsibility for the acts or the results of those acts.

Typical irresponsible behavior is all it is. But of course when a baby is in view.. now it’s all about her ‘right’ and ‘choice’ to her body! Forgetting entirely she made her choice and used her right when she pulled down her pants....she said yes.


32 posted on 04/28/2017 1:25:30 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

That would be the easiest solution to most of these problems.


33 posted on 04/28/2017 1:37:42 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ground_fog

Mgtow


34 posted on 04/28/2017 2:14:44 PM PDT by Keyhopper (Indians had bad immigration laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PrairieLady2

“That’s actually NOT new. “

not in the least. when I worked construction in the 70’s a laborer told me he used to nick his condoms when he was younger so they’d split during intercourse. I’m guessing that would have happened in the 1950’s.


35 posted on 04/28/2017 2:16:52 PM PDT by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PrairieLady2
I've had that happen totally by accident.

A case of "First the Hindenburg, and now this!"


36 posted on 04/28/2017 2:25:28 PM PDT by PLMerite (Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I recall a case in Toronto where a guy was charged with sexual assault because he had permission with a condom but not without.


37 posted on 04/28/2017 2:28:58 PM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Isn’t this basically what Julian Assange is wanted for in the Netherlands?


38 posted on 04/29/2017 9:35:31 AM PDT by Valpal1 (I am enjoying the lamentations of their girly-men on social media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbtbell

I do not assume this story is true. Sounds like a false story, like how men beat their wives during the Superbowl., etc.


39 posted on 04/29/2017 12:11:58 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ground_fog

Exactly. Article smells of feminist BS.


40 posted on 04/29/2017 12:12:45 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson