Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alternatives?
McGovern tried it and it was a real eye opener.

Let me guess. He ran into the business end of all the regulations and labor laws he and his ilk legislated?

29 posted on 04/28/2017 12:24:47 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Lizavetta

It wasn’t as much Federal as it was local and state fees, inspections, and requirements.


30 posted on 04/28/2017 12:45:54 PM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Lizavetta

This is From TechDirt:

George McGovern On Why Politicians Who Haven’t Built A Business Are Bad At Regulating

from the good-points dept

With the passing of former Senator and Presidential candidate George McGovern this weekend, the Wall Street Journal reran a 1992 column he wrote about how much he learned from trying to start a business after he’d left politics. TheMoneyIllusion has an excerpt as well:
In 1988, I invested most of the earnings from this lecture circuit acquiring the leasehold on Connecticut’s Stratford Inn. Hotels, inns and restaurants have always held a special fascination for me. The Stratford Inn promised the realization of a longtime dream to own a combination hotel, restaurant and public conference facility — complete with an experienced manager and staff.

In retrospect, I wish I had known more about the hazards and difficulties of such a business, especially during a recession of the kind that hit New England just as I was acquiring the inn’s 43-year leasehold. I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.

He goes on to talk about how all sorts of crazy regulations, that may have appeared to make sense to the politicians passing them, were actually serving to create a huge headache for businesses — often because whoever is writing the laws has no idea what they’re talking about:
In short, “one-size-fits-all” rules for business ignore the reality of the marketplace. And setting thresholds for regulatory guidelines at artificial levels — e.g., 50 employees or more, $500,000 in sales — takes no account of other realities, such as profit margins, labor intensive vs. capital intensive businesses, and local market economics.

The problem we face as legislators is: Where do we set the bar so that it is not too high to clear? I don’t have the answer. I do know that we need to start raising these questions more often.


31 posted on 04/28/2017 12:57:10 PM PDT by alternatives? (Why have an army if there are no borders?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson