Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mulligan

Can’t there be fault with both sides here?

United shouldn’t have asked Dao to leave after he had been seated, at least for the reason it did. They also should have upped their monetary incentive.

On the other hand, do we really want passengers deciding for themselves when to obey orders from airport police to leave — and to violently resist whenever they feel like it? There will be situations when a seated passenger should leave to protect the wellbeing of a lot of people.


21 posted on 04/26/2017 8:04:09 PM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Socon-Econ

Yeah, but if United had followed your first comment, the second would have not been necessary. Somehow, “customer service” means something a whole lot different to the airlines than it does to every other business. The have always put on this layer of bull$hit about “the friendly skies,” but the way they’ve always treated their paying customers is completely different. The lone exception in my air travel experiences has been Southwest. They are a gem amongst a bunch of lumps of coal.


147 posted on 04/26/2017 11:11:31 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson