The liberals judge situations based on ever shifting subjectively biased criteria. Depending on whatever benefits the liberal view of a situation, that determines what their criteria are.
So in Napolitano’s time in Arizona, it fit the liberal view to say that the state couldn’t take action against illegal aliens, because it was a federal matter.
Now that the federal government under Trump is taking strong actions, counter to what liberals want to happen, now they have decided that states and localities should be dealing with illegal aliens as they see fit, not the federal government.
Being liberal means there are no consistent standards.
It doesn’t matter the motivation for the judge’s actions.
What matters is the effect. Just like the EO on refugee vetting is no where, so too is stopping funding for sanctuary cities.
Mark my words ... the courts will shut down the wall, too, if the President should ever go forward with it.
Trump needs to figure out how to punch though this ...
Yes. In their own words, they want to impose socialism/totalitarianism "By any means necessary."
Being a LIB means (a) you are anti-Rule-of-Law, (b) a criminal, (c) an idiot, (d) a lunatic or (e) all of the above. (Hint: “e” is the only possible answer)