After the last election Republicans control 69 houses of the 99 state legislative houses. Republicans control 31 of the 50 state legislatures. To stop any unwise or imprudent amendment would require only 13 of these 69 Statehouses (from different states) or about 19%, fewer than one in five.
The problem will not be to stop left-wing amendments but to pass prudent conservative amendments which restore the Constitution by invoking the Constitution.
If the Congress of the United States elects to have the ratification procedures conducted by conventions rather than legislatures, the method of selecting the delegates to those conventions would be chosen by the legislatures. If only 13 legislative bodies out of 99 object to the method chosen by the other body because it is considered to favor a leftist amendment, there is no ratification forthcoming from that state.
By either procedure the odds of a liberal amendment getting past so many conservative legislative bodies in so many states is both arithmetically and practically remote.
Finally, this is only the last line of defense, there are innumerable steps along the way which make a "runaway convention" virtually impossible and render the need for the states to fail to ratify very likely superfluous.
Finally, this is only the last line of defense, there are innumerable steps along the way which make a "runaway convention" virtually impossible and render the need for the states to fail to ratify very likely superfluous.
The same was said in 1787 and we ended up with a runaway convention. Yes, the result that time was fortuitous, but the delegates which will be sent to the Article V convention aren't made of the same stuff as the Framers. Any change to the Articles of Confederation required unanimous consent of all the States. During the Constitutional Convention, that rule was changed. Why should we trust that any claims of "only 13 to defeat" and "virtually impossible" are true when we know that this did happen in the only example in united States history?
James R. McClure Jr.
Jeffersonian Anti-Federalist Democrat