Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
Not strange at all. Those counties, along with St. Bernard, Plaquemines, Jefferson, St. John, St. Charles, St. James Ascension, Assumption, Terrebonne, Lafourche, St. Mary, St. Martin, and Orleans parishes, had been liberated from the confederate forces. Since they were no longer in rebellion then the federal government couldn't legally end slavery there.

That is "f***ed up several kinds of ways. So basically the statement is still true, that slavery existed longer in the Union than it did in the Confederacy.

Kinda blows a big hole in "the War was fought over slavery" narrative. As i've said before, it was fought so Washington D.C. could maintain economic control over the South's money and trade.

142 posted on 04/24/2017 4:35:11 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
That is "f***ed up several kinds of ways. So basically the statement is still true, that slavery existed longer in the Union than it did in the Confederacy.

Since the Confederacy was never really an independent, sovereign nation then your statement is basically correct.

Kinda blows a big hole in "the War was fought over slavery" narrative.

Depends on which side you're referring to. For the North, it was not over slavery. For the South, it was.

As i've said before, it was fought so Washington D.C. could maintain economic control over the South's money and trade.

So you keep saying. I'm mildly surprised that you haven't hauled out that tariff collection picture of yours.

145 posted on 04/24/2017 4:44:59 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson