[Scrambler Bob]

Instead they form a conclusion, skip the experimentation, ignore the data, and call anyone who disagrees anti-science.
= = =

They cherry pick some data and call it “evidence”.

[Telepathic Intruder]

They cherry pick some data and call it “evidence”.

They call it proof, and say there's a consensus. Cherry picking was exactly what the climategate scandal with the IPCC was all about. They deleted data they didn't like, and kept what they did. It's also what the mainstream media does with the news. But a half truth is still a lie.