Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ouderkirk

It was once considered improper for a foot soldier to attack a knight.


21 posted on 04/17/2017 8:01:58 AM PDT by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: hoosierham

I do recall that there was a British thing about not attacking officers....would induce chaos etc.

I am a total war kind of guy. If you’re going to go to war, you do whatever is necessary to win. All are legitimate targets... Knights, Generals, Kings, and civilians.


38 posted on 04/17/2017 8:18:53 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: hoosierham

> It was once considered improper for a foot soldier to attack a knight. <

Yes. And Pope Urban II banned the use of crossbows (in 1096) because it gave ignorant peasants a decent chance to take down gentleman knights.


90 posted on 04/17/2017 10:53:54 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson