Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Send 1,000 Fighter Jets To North Korea's Doorstep And Threaten 'Overwhelming Response'
Daily Star ^ | April 17, 2017 | By Joshua Nevett

Posted on 04/17/2017 5:45:43 AM PDT by Fennie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Fennie
Lots of folks doubting the ability/reasoning for us to send 1,000 aircraft ("Fighter Jets" may encompass all sorts of aircraft) but one has to admit, when Trump sends a message, he sends a bold MESSAGE.....
41 posted on 04/17/2017 7:14:24 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian

the only problem with Pence being there is we know nothing will happen until after he leaves. Giving us time to get into position?


42 posted on 04/17/2017 7:37:23 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

“I’m betting we’ve already got that many nearby.”.......

When the SHTF you WILL KNOW! For now, keeping our powder dry and mouths SHUT is the best approach. NEVER, EVER give up your advantage and Trump knows and says, “It’s the art of the deal”.


43 posted on 04/17/2017 7:38:00 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Oh, for God sake, can’t we just whack this guy?


44 posted on 04/17/2017 7:39:56 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

Don’t be silly, it is not unwarranted “negative” thinking to question an obviously flaky article. We do not now have “1,000 fighter jets on North Korea’s doorstep.”

Noting that fact does not mean we are not perfectly capable of doing that. It merely means that there are no indications we have actually done so to date. That would be huge move of a lot more USAF and USN planes than has occurred in recent weeks and months. There would be more carrier groups moved and/or a lot more re-positioning of air force squadrons to achieve those numbers in that immediate area.


45 posted on 04/17/2017 9:32:20 AM PDT by Enchante (Libtards are enemies of true civilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

The USA has around 2500 active duty “fighter jets” in the Air Force + Navy + Marines, but most of them are not based anywhere near Korea. To build up to 1,000 in the immediate vicinity (South Korea, Japan, carrier groups etc.) would take a lot more publicly noted movements than have occurred in recent weeks/months. Such a large set of movements would not have gone on in secret.


46 posted on 04/17/2017 9:43:57 AM PDT by Enchante (Libtards are enemies of true civilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

You can bet that China is watching the movement of our military assets....very closely. They could be intended for them one day, eh?


47 posted on 04/17/2017 10:05:08 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

“Around 1,000 US airmen and fighter jets”

Incredibly stupid journalists changed that to ‘1000 jets and pilots’.


48 posted on 04/17/2017 10:18:04 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

“Giving us time to get into position?”

That and an “in your face” direct message from the Trump administration.

VP Pence at the DMZ sends the message loud and clear.
We haven’t had this much testosterone in an administration since maybe Eisenhower.


49 posted on 04/17/2017 10:42:08 AM PDT by oldvirginian (Government is at best a necessary evil, at worst a millstone around the neck of the citizenry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

I heard somewhere along the line several years ago that a squadron of 6 F16s could have done as damage with the precisions guided bombs as those large B17-B24 strikes did with hundreds of planes.


50 posted on 04/17/2017 10:44:33 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Better watch putting that stuff in Japan or Okinawa.

I've heard that if you get too many in one place, the whole dam island can tip over.

51 posted on 04/17/2017 11:13:19 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
I've heard that if you get too many in one place, the whole dam island can tip over.

Guam definitely, Okinawa possibly, Japan would just sink from the southern end...

52 posted on 04/17/2017 11:27:35 AM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

More like 500 jets and 500 pilots


53 posted on 04/17/2017 11:32:34 AM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Just another (BIG) reason the fat maniac is a far bigger concern to China than to us ... and I have no doubt that China will not hesitate to take him out (very likely already in the works).

China will be careful not to "invade" the Korean peninsula because that, too, would bring a response from President Trump.

54 posted on 04/17/2017 11:32:42 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

I can think of at least 5 airfields in Japan and 2 in SK that could support - on top of the 3 carriers and all within range of NK. I think the 1000 they speak of is all aircraft not just fighters of course.


55 posted on 04/17/2017 11:33:45 AM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Nonsense.


56 posted on 04/17/2017 12:19:55 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"We have over 6,000 in inventory. And I still don't believe it."

And I don't believe we have over 6,000 in inventory.

57 posted on 04/17/2017 1:07:35 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

This is DUMB news and I doubt in this administration would they telegraph what we are doing. I also think having all our aircraft carriers in one spot is dumb.


58 posted on 04/17/2017 1:13:43 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Drain the swamp. Build the wall. Open the Pizzagate. I refuse to inhabit any safe space.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I don’t think we have 1000 mission ready fighter planes at any one time.


59 posted on 04/17/2017 1:23:49 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
Including the air crews themselves. 25 missions before you get rotated out.
60 posted on 04/17/2017 5:58:17 PM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson