[stylin19a]

Nice try. if your posts lacked clarity and you want to clarify your statements go ahead.
don't do it by calling me out using facts not in evidence.

I questioned your original inconstancy and I further responded to what you wrote.

Please re-read your post #33.
how did I misread your responses there ?
and how is that even close to what you now say ?

Let's leave it at: this whole thing stunk.

[JayGalt]

Sorry that we are not communicating. Perhaps we will have better luck another time. We can agree completely about the main point - the whole thing stunk.

The first post you responded to #6, I was pushing back on the idea that if he had once been convicted of a salacious incident then it didn’t matter what occurred during this incident.

I don’t like the technique of attacking the victim rather than addressing the incident on its own merits. I chose those adjectives because they were what was seen by the employees that interacted with him. I would have said a slight middle aged Chicano woman just as easily. Basically a nonthreatening individual who is caught in a problem that I may be able to solve if I think creatively.