Posted on 04/08/2017 7:09:13 AM PDT by b4its2late
Ping
It was a false flag
I’ve advanced no conspiracy, I simply have no idea what happened. Furthermore, for you to nod to our intelligence gathers, as if they aren’t capable of misleading DJT, is to redefine gullible.
gathers = gatherers
Wars are never started out of a sense of “compassion.”
Notice the hot topic of Susan Rice’s treason essentially got wiped off the news, too.
Yep, just short one “Baby Sarin Gas Factory” sign.
Syria or Russia is the only two realistic options in regard to implementing a chemical attack from an aircraft.
As Scott Adams noted, U.S. military monitors the flights of ALL planes in the region. If it was air-dropped gas, we know exactly which plane, where it took off, and where it landed.
This conspiracy idiocy on this issue equates to the 9/11 conspiracies. It is embarrassing to any lucid.
Ah yes, “Try to be rational”, the “talk down to” tack. I don’t profess to know what happened, and have no time for statists who eagerly spout gov’t lines. I know the parties many previously held in credibility and confidence are no longer to be trusted, and are very capable of pulling off stunts FAR beyond what people can imagine.
You believe what you want and others will believe as they wish. Attempts to denigrate, smear, or otherwise demean other points of view are unhelpful (and unkind).
I think Savage turns on people too fast. Haven’t listened to him since the day he was trashing Kelly Anne.
Well its a done deal now. I could care less about Assad’s airport. It gets all the negative Trump bashing off the news for a few days. The neocons are giddy over Trump all of a sudden.
What I don’t like is these two snowflake no nothings advising Trump. It reeks of nepotism and they are not competent advisors nor are they the least bit conservative.
Explain how they capable of pulling off a chemical weapon attack via an aircraft.
Let’s hope so...
That these entities are suspect is a position that can be legitimately held without the need to know, understand, or explain methodology.
As I said before, details of real capabilities far exceed the common person’s knowledge and understanding. It does not negate the possibility/probability thereof.
>>What I don’t like is these two snowflake no nothings advising Trump. It reeks of nepotism and they are not competent advisors nor are they the least bit conservative.
*********************************************************
Amen, and amen!
It works sort of like the theory of evolution. There is no logic or facts to back up the premise but it's still possible in theory.
You could say that the "Kushner's" influence has increased because of the "policy trumps administrative competence" mistakes made by the transition and initial "administration" team. Their mistakes have been harmful while being well intentioned. At the end of the day, nothing gets done on ideology alone. Some even see nothing as preferable. But for Trump, standing still and declaring progress is non sequitur.
I still remember how the Iraq war turned to nightmare when good ole "Bremmer" hit the ground with the post war administration plan for Iraq. What resulted was just a money giveaway with no forethought before of what to do after you win the war. Bush never recovered IMO. And the whole thing was indefensible once boiled down to the essence.
I think the same thing happened to Trump when he thought he was hitting the ground running. The difference being is that Trump is smart enough to not defend administrative incompetence but rather get it figured out. Those that predict the future gain influence, and that is what seems to have happened in this case with Jared and Ivanka. Thus, the "kids" may be very valuable to achieving administrative success, even if that has to diverge a bit from ideological policy perfection.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.