[sargon]

There is no imminent threat to the US, a threat that would not admit of delay, that requires an immediate attack on Syria.

Such a determination is solely the judgement of the President, and if the Congress disagrees with the president's determination regarding an "imminent threat", then there is an eminently Constitutional remedy: impeachment.

Under the Constitution, impeaching the President for the "high crime and misdemeanor" of bombing Syria yesterday would be the legitimate solution.

In the absence of such a proceeding, such use of military action by the President—as its Commander in Chief—is de facto Constitutonal...

[Ray76]

That rhetoric may be satisfying to sycophants, but it is nonsense.

[TTFX]

In the absence of such a proceeding, such use of military action by the President—as its Commander in Chief—is de facto Constitutonal...

---

Sure, just as gun control is de facto legal with corrupt judges. What matters is that it’s illegal in both cases.