Skip to comments.
UPDATE: Susan Rice Confirms Her “Unmasking Requests” Were for President Obama
The Conservative Treehouse ^
| April 4, 2017
| Sundance
Posted on 04/04/2017 3:21:30 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Excellent explanation by Sundance, article continues at site.
To: COUNTrecount
This just confirms that Obama was indeed involved. He wanted a report and a compilation.
To: COUNTrecount
yes. very good.
thanx for expanding
3
posted on
04/04/2017 3:25:18 PM PDT
by
thinden
To: COUNTrecount
0bama was a dictator wannabe.
4
posted on
04/04/2017 3:25:26 PM PDT
by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: COUNTrecount
By 2013, Obamas PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the presidents top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. Hell, by last December it probably went to F Chuck Todd.
5
posted on
04/04/2017 3:26:46 PM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
To: COUNTrecount
If the trail leads to Obama, then it leads to the puppetmaster, Jarrett.
6
posted on
04/04/2017 3:27:45 PM PDT
by
exit82
(The opposition has already been Trumped!)
To: COUNTrecount
Funny, Obama rarely got his PDB. I believe this subject was discussed on FR. I am sure he got these because someone had to pass them on to Hillary. Fix the problem. indict them all.
7
posted on
04/04/2017 3:28:06 PM PDT
by
DrDude
(To the Victor go the spoils! Kick A$$ Trump.)
To: COUNTrecount
I wonder when and if Sessions will bring charges against her and Obama.
8
posted on
04/04/2017 3:28:46 PM PDT
by
CincyRichieRich
(Drain the swamp. Build the wall. Open the Pizzagate. I refuse to inhabit any safe space.)
To: COUNTrecount
Now the question is, did it go to Hillary?
To: COUNTrecount
Name, uh, not providedThe thing with these Obama people is that they're so lawyerly, everything they do is just inside the law, not necessarily within ethics, but the LSM will give them a pass on that and claim they did "nothing wrong". They know what they're doing and how to cover their tracks.
10
posted on
04/04/2017 3:29:34 PM PDT
by
scottinoc
("DC is too small to be a state but too large to be an asylum for the mentally deranged"-Anne Gorsuch)
To: COBOL2Java
...and Hillary Clinton...
11
posted on
04/04/2017 3:29:45 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
To: DrDude
Excellent point. Hussein only wanted PDB a few times a year. Hillary was the logical recipient of the data. Lock her up!
12
posted on
04/04/2017 3:30:47 PM PDT
by
MayflowerMadam
("To be angry about trifles is mean and childish; to rage and be furious is brutish" Spurgeon)
To: Parley Baer; dfwgator
[ This just confirms that Obama was indeed involved. ]
And a whole lotta other Obama admin folks.
Meanwhile in Illinois, I’ve heard they served a wicked pepper steak on Thursdays.
13
posted on
04/04/2017 3:33:05 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
To: scottinoc
A couple observations, if I remember what I’ve recently read here:
1) Unmasking is allowable only if the “US Person” appears to be involved in something extremely serious — like terrorism.
2) The “US Person” who turned out to be Donald Trump was NOT implicated in any way, at any time, in any sort of criminal behavior.
And yet this particular “US Person” showed up in the President’s Daily Briefing on a regular basis? And the references to this “US Person” were so gosh darn compelling that Susan Rice said: “I just HAVE to know who this person is — let’s unmask this one!”
No.
No it just doesn’t work that way.
14
posted on
04/04/2017 3:35:16 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
To: Parley Baer
Very nice. Once again, Trump is right
15
posted on
04/04/2017 3:36:04 PM PDT
by
Lee25
To: CincyRichieRich
I am hoping and praying this happens being sooner, not later.
To: COUNTrecount
17
posted on
04/04/2017 3:39:44 PM PDT
by
harpu
( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
To: COUNTrecount
So, she decided on her own or was directed by Obama to exposed anyone Trump talked to as they were recording calls and emails? But it wasn’t spying. LOL. This makes Nixon look innocent
To: scottinoc
That’s why Donald Trump has the Tweet.
19
posted on
04/04/2017 3:41:41 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Why would she even need to ask for an unmasking if the activity seen was unmistakably Trump? What did that serve except to get her into deeper dutch?
20
posted on
04/04/2017 3:42:56 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson