Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

The much more plausible explanation is she requested go get all the transcripts of any phone conversations we have intercepted that were by Trump, these specific Trump aides, and any Trump family member.

That is no longer incidental collection, not when you specifically request transcripts of phone conversations of specific people. That is taking what is vacuumed up, meeting every phone call on the planet that the NSA collects, and then searching for specific information on specific Americans.

And that my friends is treason.


Great, clear post.

This needs to get so much exposure that the media will be forced to say something to the 70% of busy, gullible Americans.

There is no way this intel was collected / disseminated legally. And Susan Rice didn’t come up with the idea all by her lonesome. Nor did she force herself on the talk shows to give that video explanation for Benghazi. QUI BONO?


168 posted on 04/03/2017 11:35:36 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle
The much more plausible explanation is she requested go get all the transcripts of any phone conversations we have intercepted that were by Trump, these specific Trump aides, and any Trump family member.

That is no longer incidental collection, not when you specifically request transcripts of phone conversations of specific people. That is taking what is vacuumed up, meeting every phone call on the planet that the NSA collects, and then searching for specific information on specific Americans.

And that my friends is treason.

This was a diabolical, illegal fishing expedition—worthy only of the most totalitarian regimes—and right now the Media is so busy trying to explain it away, that they're actually exposing the fact that it was the worst type of abuse imaginable.

The Democrats are screwed 9 ways to China. Right now they're basically saying "Donald Trump and his staff weren't specifically targeted with surveillance". If they had been, that would have been bad enough!

Think about the alternative for a moment. What basically happened is Democrat and Establishment operatives like Susan Rice—at the behest of the highest levels of the Executive Branch and/or the Hillary campaign—used elements of the intelligence community to conduct warrantless fishing expeditions for the sole purpose of political gain, extortion, and personal destruction.

These gangsters were sifting the virtually limitless amount of SIGINT just sitting around in NSA databases, specifically with the goal of getting "dirt" on political opponents to use against them in a Presidential election (and then a Presidential transition).

This makes Richard Nixon look like a schoolboy.

It's a scandal and crime of the highest magnitude.

If in fact this Establishment and Democrat (but I repeat myself) subversion turns out to be what happened—and it certainly appears to be the case—President Trump must see to it that those responsible are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Indeed, the President will lose my support if he doesn't drain the swamp as a result of this criminal activity by the Democrats (presuming that's what happened). Something like this can't be swept under the rug. It's civil war material...

This development will hopefully spark a national debate on the People reclaiming their Right to Privacy under the Fourth Amendment (and elsewhere). Enough is enough. I'm not willing to live in a totalitarian snooping state, even if it that means it's harder to fight terrorism. The Democrats are out of control, as usual...

178 posted on 04/04/2017 12:04:06 AM PDT by sargon ("If we were in the midst of a zombie apocalypse, the Left would protest for zombies' rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson