Susan Rice Ordered Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving Trump

The Daily Caller ^ | March 3, 2017 | By Richard Pollock

[Elsie]

>>Don’t forget, nothing in Government gets done with out a project number, time codes, weekly time sheets made out . . . <<

[COBOL2Java]

At any other time in our history, this would cause a Constitutional crisis. This is exponentially worse than Watergate. Where is the f’ing outrage from the Reps?

And why would the Reps be outraged? They were in on the game.

They wanted their guy, who would continue the Kabuki Theater:

The RATs wanted their gal, who would make us EU2:

...instead, America said FU to both parties and wisely chose door #3, who was neither a Rep nor a RAT:

---

...which TOTALLY messed up the plans of the UniParty.

[ichabod1]

Mr. Trump has stated several times that as soon as they start reporting what he says honestly, he will be able to scale down his use of Twitter, but right now it’s the only way he has of getting his message out.

[MayflowerMadam]

“This type of monitoring was allowed because they told us it was necessary”

If this type “legal” of monitoring (”incidental”?) was done, you can bet there’s a whole lot more info on Trump, et al., they gleaned in other ways. This is the tip of the iceberg. Sadly, we’ll most likely never know what other nefarious crap was going on compliments of Obama.

[TalBlack]

It’s says something about Trump that bozo tried to uncover dirt on him using the full power of the intelligence services of the United States of America AND HE COULDN’T DO IT.

[Buttons12]

An inherent problem with Twitter is the severe length limitation which forces the user to abbreviate his thoughts, and that often introduces distortion. I am not saying that Trump shouldn't use Twitter, but I agree that he does need to be more careful when he does.

Seems to me he was being unusually careful that time, using quote marks so that readers would not take "wires tapped" too literally. Unfortunately a lot of people don't seem familiar with that usage.

[Elsie]

These gangsters were sifting the virtually limitless amount of SIGINT just sitting around in NSA databases, specifically with the goal of getting "dirt" on political opponents to use against them in a Presidential election (and then a Presidential transition).

[Fresh Wind]

True.

[Elsie]

Trump communicates to American people in normal language vs priggish “surveiled.”

[pugmama]

Interesting comments here from a person who studies body language:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/body-language-expert-susan-rice-lied-repeatedly-unmasking-surveillance-makes-skin-crawl-video/

[Elsie]

If the party's leaders really believe that Russian intervention is anywhere in the top 100 list of reasons why some 155 million eligible voters (out of 231 million) chose not to pull a lever for Hillary Clinton last year, they're farther along down the Purity of Essence nut-hole than Mark Warner." -Taibbi, 4/3/17

But Tina Fey says...

http://www.refinery29.com/2017/04/148205/tina-fey-white-college-educated-women-trump-aclu

[Flick Lives]

And still, no one in the media has guts enough to connect the dots back to Obama himself. She was his top National Security adviser!

Explains the conspiratorial silence of the MSM on the Rice scandal. They don't want to talk about it because it leads immediately to awkward questions like who ordered Rice to produce detailed info on Trump campaign phone calls. She reported directly to Obama. Either she decided to do this illegal surveillance of political opponents on her own, or Obama ordered it.

Consider the Obama administration weaponized the IRS to try and destroy groups it did not like. The Obama administration ordered an armed raid on Fender Guitar, Fender Guitar!!, as political payback under the guise of worrying about what species of wood was being used for their fret boards. The Obama administration is no stranger to using a phony legal excuse as cover for their illegal activity.

[Elsie]

As a slap to citizens, Republicans just passed the law to spy on your browsing history.

I'd bet some folks can do it withOUT a 'law'!

[ScottinVA]

It sounds like this has gone from the “incidental” to the “intentional.”

Rand Paul has it right; Susan Rice should be sworn in to testify.

[TalBlack]

The thing about a prosecutor is that bozo would no doubt have used the same intelligence agencies against every Republican he could think of long before Trump came along...

[Elsie]

[TheStickman]

“The purpose of my criticisms is to get him to stop these impulsive tweets...”

This is why you have no credibility with me. Nothing Trump does is impulsive. That’s a false narrative put forth by progressives & the never-trumpers on the right. You folks project your own inadequacies on Trump purely because you can’t seem to comprehend what he is really about.

Trump is doing a great job & I applaud his use of twitter.

[faucetman]

“Didn’t we learn recently that our intell agencies can create fake “prints” on documents to make it appear they originated in Russia or other foreign countries”

I don’t think they can tell “where” (what country) the fingerprints were applied. /s

[Bryher1]

Ping

[nathanbedford]

Yours is not a widely held opinion according to the polls. Please see my reply #212.